---

The recent article concerning former Patrick County Board of Supervisors interim member Jane Fulk and county discussions contains significant inaccuracies, omits crucial context, and raises serious ethical concerns around Jane Fulk and the reporting of this story. This necessitates a clarification of the record.

The article falsely claims that Doug Perry stated EMS workers would work more hours for the same pay. This is categorically false. Mr. Perry made no such statement, and this misrepresentation distorts the discussions surrounding EMS wages. Furthermore, the article inaccurately suggests that Steve Marshall referenced Jane Fulk in emails or public discussions prior to publication. This is also untrue. Mr. Marshall had not publicly mentioned Ms. Fulk before the articles release.

The article fails to address Ms. Fulks direct involvement in what many perceive as constructive termination efforts. Her husbands public campaigning at Board of Supervisors meetings for the county administrators firing, coupled with her alleged participation in pressuring employees to resign, raises serious ethical questions and suggests a pattern of behavior that warrants our scrutiny.

The articles portrayal of Mr. Perry and Mr. Marshall as attacking Ms. Fulks reputation is misleading and it shifts the focus away from the core issue of accountability and fair treatment for county employees.

By framing Marshall and Perrys concerns as personal attacks, Ms. Fulk stoops to victim-playing thus obscuring the need for accountability, transparency and fairness in how county employees are treated.

Proper Procedures for Addressing Employee Issues

Given Ms. Fulks actions, and the apparent alignment of her successor, Dan River Districts own Supervisor Andrew Overby with her agenda, it is crucial to reiterate best practices for employer-employee relations. Addressing employee concerns or performance issues requires adherence to established procedures to ensure fairness and legal compliance:

• Documentation: Maintain thorough, objective records of employee performance, including any incidents or concerns.
• Communication: Address issues directly with the employee in a private, respectful manner, providing clear feedback and an opportunity for response.
• Consistency: Apply policies and procedures consistently to all employees to avoid discrimination or favoritism.
• Due Process: Ensure employees can present their side of the story before disciplinary action.
• Legal Compliance: Adhere to all applicable labor laws, including those related to wages, hours, and termination.
• Avoid Constructive Termination: Creating conditions that force an employee to resign is unethical and potentially illegal. Workplace conditions must be fair and reasonable.

The inaccuracies, omitted context, and unethical conduct demonstrated in the article necessitate this response. It is vital to set the record straight and focus on the facts. Ms. Fulks actions, particularly her alleged involvement in constructive termination efforts and her husbands public campaigning, raise serious ethical concerns that deserve our attention.